-
-
|
Living
in Entirety
By Ashish Virmani
(Bharat Soka
Gakkai [BSG] member, Bombay)
I’m 37, a journalist,
and have been practicing Nichiren Buddhism for the last six years. I wish
to talk about the long life route that finally brought me to Buddhism —
about some of the different phases in my life, primarily mental phases
during my teenage years and my twenties — before I finally found in Nichiren
Daishonin’s religion, a philosophy that encompasses the entirety of life
and living. These phases are like fragments of a jigsaw puzzle that was
finally put together in the light of the SGI’s philosophy — and hence I
want to talk about them.
There are two
things that I need to state for you to understand better what I am about
to say: The first is that I feel that I have been blessed by being born
to my wonderful parents and blessed to have been given the opportunity
to better my status in life through higher education. In a country like
India, where education decides personal and social destiny, my studies
were sponsored entirely by my father and mother and I feel truly appreciative
that I was able to receive my Masters in journalism from Marquette University,
Wisconsin (USA), and that my sister was able to get her MBA from one of
the best management institutes in Bombay. Which is not to say that my family
was ever landed gentry, but we have a warm, loving family, three square
meals a day, and the aspiration to do the best for ourselves in life. There
were some times that were tough and other times that were financially easier,
but during my crucial educational years there was enough money to see us
through.
Since my formative
years were spared of hard financial struggles, I had the time to experiment
with various schools of philosophy — this is generally believed to be the
pursuit of those with time and money on their hands. Also since I was an
arts student, like most of my co-students I studied psychology, anthropology,
and sociology, looking for answers to my questions from these disciplines.
For many years,
I went through a phase which I shall now define as “cognitive thinking.”
It was a school of thought in psychology that believes that what you think
about most of the time is your reality. It also believes that by recognising
and altering your pattern of thinking you can alter your reality. In other
words, it is a clinical form of positive thinking. It’s a perfectly rational
way of doing things and for many years I attempted to model my behaviour
and thinking to this pattern. If I got angry or upset, I would try to rationalise
it and, by rationalising it, I would think that I had eliminated it — which
was the promise of cognitive thinking.
For example,
if someone has a fear of being in overcrowded places, cognitive thinking
would say that by defining your feelings about being in such overcrowded
places, by acknowledging this claustrophobia, you could change your reaction
to it. However, I soon found this was not the case, at least for me, and
cognitive thinking fell far short of what it had promised. For example,
one may recognise anger with one’s rational mind, but that does not take
the emotional feeling of anger away. Or you may understand that you have
a fear of dying, but the next time you are in a perilous situation you
will probably feel the fear anyway. In fact, when I look back at it, if
cognitive thinking were all it promised, then intellectuals would be the
ones fighting the Bosnian war or the war in Iraq, because according to
the cognitive premise, they should have conquered their feelings of fear
by rationalising them.
I was in college
when I landed my first job as a reporter for a film magazine in Bombay
called “Movie.” The nice thing about the job was that it gave me the opportunity
to use my creative talents in a real world scenario. This was a period
when I had to chase after and interview top-notch film stars, those who
inhabit a glamorous and creative world — which was a pretty exciting prospect
for a college student. Thus began my next phase of thinking — I would like
to call it the Cult of the Personality.
Mixing in the
high-powered world of film stars in the Indian film industry I came to
believe that Celebrityhood was the solution to the world’s problems. I
believbed that if I immersed myself completely in the personality traits
of a person who personified perfection, such as Amitabh Bachchan (a Hollywood
equivalent would be Marlon Brando), then my life condition would elevate
to the level of Amitabh. This is a common fallacy among youth and for those
who do not know better, it is entirely natural. Especially when you live
in the atmosphere of a film magazine, where you are surrounded 24-7 by
a haze of stardust. I don’t think I could shake off this perception even
years later when I was working full-time for a regular newspaper.
The problem
with the Cult of the Personality is that, while it’s all very well to appreciate
someone else’s achievements (as Buddhism will tell you), each person comes
into this world with their own karma. And no amount of rationalizations
or imitations will budge your individual karma in any significant manner.
Also, as I later realised on becoming a more seasoned journalist, evaluations
about someone else’s life on the surface may be far removed from their
personal reality. As a famous cricketer said to me recently, there is no
thermometer for happiness and unhappiness and it is up to each person to
resolve and fight for his own happiness.
So Amitabh Bachchan
(or Marlon Brando), having all that he has. still has his worries and still
must fight with his karma, as I must with mine — a fact which hit me with
full force, when I recently interviewed him. But at least now I have my
faith in the Gohonzon to take me through every trial and tribulation and
victory and success in life — as yet I can’t say that about the rest of
humanity.
In my twenties,
I was still grappling with the problems of life without a glimmer of relief
in sight. I also went through a phase of drinking and experimentation with
hedonism, but I found that, far from being a solution to my problems, it
only mired me deeper in the slush and sludge of life. When I had reached
the end of my wits, I was introduced to Nichiren Daishonin’s Buddhism by
my mother.
Nichiren Buddhism
talks about having faith in the Gohonzon and, after almost six years of
having been an SGI member, I feel that faith goes beyond the realm of the
rational and cognitive mind and encompasses it. Once I accepted the basic
principles of Buddhism I learned to appreciate and be grateful for the
workings of my life. Praying for my own happiness and for the happiness
of others, I began to perceive my environment in an entirely different
and more positive way. I began to view my life as a potential winner, no
matter how trying the external circumstances were. There was a marked improvement
in almost every sphere of my life — my relations with my parents and sister
improved, I began to have wonderful breakthroughs in my work situation,
and my universe which I had perceived as chaotic slowly began to fall into
a rhythm. After all those years of experimenting with fragments of philosophies
that could not encompass the mystery of a single human life, I was back
on track, thanks to my mother.
I feel above
all that Nichiren Buddhism allows its practitioners to enter a cycle of
positivity. By giving its followers protection, practitioners develop a
positive frame of mind, and then victory is possible for the individual.
In my own case, I have seen it happen when I achieved all the professional
breakthroughs that I needed very badly — whether it was interviews with
people like Andrew Lloyd Webber, Nobel laureate Amartya Sen, or author
of Freedom At Midnight Dominique Lapierre — or even protection for
many years by an editor (who turned out to be my shoten zenjin). Also by
giving me a certain amount of happiness in my family life, it has enabled
me to break the chains of negative thinking that are impossible to break
rationally and without the leap that only faith gives.
What I have
now that I didn’t have earlier in my rational phase is gratitude — gratitude
for my life and for the people around me, gratitude for having my faith.
My determination naturally is to spread this life-supporting philosophy
to at least three other people by May 3, and to validate my life and the
positive forces in the environment with resounding victory — here and now.
|